Division 2: Redland Winter Pumas v University of Bath Ladies B (Thu 15 Feb 2018)

Match played between Jo Stubbs (home) and Emma George (away).
Match won by Jo Stubbs. Result: 9-0,9-0,9-2.

Starting level for Jo Stubbs: 240, level confidence: 67%.
Starting level for Emma George: 51, level confidence: 62%.
Jo Stubbs to win as he is currently playing 371% better than Emma George.

Jo Stubbs won all of the games and 93% of the points.
This games result would be expected if he was better by around 55% or more.
This points result would be expected if he was better by around 278% (english scoring).
These are weighted and combined to calculate that Jo Stubbs played 278% better than Emma George in this match.

Due to the difference between the players' levels, allow for the likelihood that Jo Stubbs was taking it easy by anything up to 40%. This gives him an allowed level range for this match between 76 and 240 without affecting his level.

In this case, Jo Stubbs played at level 193 and remained within his allowed range so his level will not be adjusted. Consequently, Emma George is considered to have not played better than expected and her level will also not be adjusted.

Increase level confidence due to one more match played. Jo Stubbs: 82%, Emma George: 79%. Reduce level confidence based on how unexpected the result is. Jo Stubbs: 73%, Emma George: 71%.

Final level for Jo Stubbs: 240, level confidence: 73%.
Final level for Emma George: 51, level confidence: 71%.

Notes

• This calculation is done in two main parts; first work out the adjustment needed to match the results and then apply damping. This means that levels should always be 'about right' but the time taken to get there or the volatility is dependent on the damping.
• A level also has 'level confidence' which drops if players haven't played for a long time or have had enexpected results. As low confidence levels adjust more quickly than high confidence levels, it allows these players to find their level more quickly without impacting their opponent's level too much.
• Point scores are used as well as game scores for accuracy - particularly important for 3-0 results - though we can work with game scores only too, albeit with more damping.
• Mismatched players are allowed for - you don't have to hammer your opponent. See explanation above if this applies to this match.
• The section on damping is where we still have some options. We have recently made a change to damp league matches more than tournament matches and box matches even more than that. This gives added weight to the more important matches.
• There are occasional, very small adjustments made to all players to keep the averages constant which are not covered here.
• You don't get a bonus just for winning - if you want to go up you have to play better than expected against your opponent.
• We have spent more than 5 years fine tuning the level calculations based on tens of thousands of match results and a great deal of feedback from players, team captains and coaches. It's the most usable and accurate ranking system there is in any sport, let alone squash.
• For a more complete explanation of how levels are calculated (on which this system is based) see the help file here.
• If you have thoughts/opinions on the above or any feedback on the way levels are calculated or updated, please contact us. We welcome all feedback, although we are keen squash players ourselves and would pefer to be on-court than in front of a screen so please be patient and please do try to see if your question has already been answered on the help page. We are unable to answer questions about hard anyone played in their match - we only get to see the results - and if your level didn't increase as expected please make sure you've looked at the above explanation before contacting us. If you want to go up the levels, train harder, listen to your coach and win more points. Or just be incredibly talented!